Mandahl Bay Develop...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Mandahl Bay Development St Thomas SCUTTLED

(@ms411)
Posts: 3554
Famed Member
Topic starter
 

Per today's Avis. Developer supposedly does not want to fight protesters.

 
Posted : March 13, 2015 11:32 am
(@alana33)
Posts: 12366
Illustrious Member
 

Wish I could read the article.
If true, it's wonderful news!

 
Posted : March 13, 2015 11:37 am
(@ms411)
Posts: 3554
Famed Member
Topic starter
 

Buy the Avis so you can read it.

 
Posted : March 13, 2015 11:47 am
(@alana33)
Posts: 12366
Illustrious Member
 

Not going to town today nor near anywhere that sells the Avis.

 
Posted : March 13, 2015 11:53 am
(@ms411)
Posts: 3554
Famed Member
Topic starter
 

Some other media source will probably report it, so be patient.

 
Posted : March 13, 2015 12:00 pm
(@the-oldtart)
Posts: 6523
Illustrious Member
 

The article says that, according to Mapp who spoke at a St Thomas Rotary luncheon meeting yesterday, the developers have changed their minds.

It had been recently reported that the Hyatt had already decided against participating in the development so the news may not be too surprising since the hotel was to be the focal point of the development.

Janette Millin Young has expressed her great disappointment ...

 
Posted : March 13, 2015 2:14 pm
(@alana33)
Posts: 12366
Illustrious Member
 

"Janette Millin Young has expressed her great disappointment ..."

Not exactly environmentally aware or conscientious is she?
I'll have to remember that when I next vote.

 
Posted : March 13, 2015 2:41 pm
(@ms411)
Posts: 3554
Famed Member
Topic starter
 

Mandahl - dead
WICO dock - dead but may resurrect in different location
Stadium - dead for now
Will Coral Bay join the list of dead or nearly dead?

Clarence Payne who didn't get back in as senator wrote a great environmental letter a few weeks ago which was published in at least 2 sources. "What Price Our Beaches" was name of it, I think.

Maybe he'll run again.

 
Posted : March 13, 2015 4:35 pm
(@sunshinefun)
Posts: 681
Honorable Member
 

Can we have it on St. Croix since you guys don't want it??? Please?

 
Posted : March 13, 2015 6:47 pm
(@ms411)
Posts: 3554
Famed Member
Topic starter
 

Can we have it on St. Croix since you guys don't want it??? Please?

Ask Monarch Mapp if he can get them for you.

 
Posted : March 13, 2015 6:54 pm
(@alana33)
Posts: 12366
Illustrious Member
 

You're welcome to it!

 
Posted : March 13, 2015 9:12 pm
(@peachey)
Posts: 36
Eminent Member
 

They should built it on the old Hovensa site. They couldn't possibly damage that eco-system anymore then it already is. Clean up the area, and bring in much needed economic vitality to the island.

 
Posted : March 13, 2015 10:19 pm
CruzanIron
(@cruzaniron)
Posts: 2533
Famed Member
 

There is no "old hovensa site"

 
Posted : March 13, 2015 11:17 pm
(@peachey)
Posts: 36
Eminent Member
 

So there is no site that used to be an operating oil refinery, but is now just a holding site? I could have sworn I have read posts about it here, as well as many articles online. I must be mistaken.

 
Posted : March 13, 2015 11:27 pm
CruzanIron
(@cruzaniron)
Posts: 2533
Famed Member
 

Maybe the old Harvey/Martin Marietta / Vialco site. It has been closed for 20 years and they are still cleaning up the polluted ground.

 
Posted : March 13, 2015 11:51 pm
(@east-ender)
Posts: 5404
Illustrious Member
(@alana33)
Posts: 12366
Illustrious Member
 

Thanks. I saw the article this morning but with the attorney, George Dudley, unwilling to comment, I still have doubts about the project being completely dropped since Mapp seems to have a propensity to put his "spin" on things.

 
Posted : March 14, 2015 3:51 pm
CruzanIron
(@cruzaniron)
Posts: 2533
Famed Member
 

You only ever hear one side of the story when it comes to Mapp.

 
Posted : March 14, 2015 4:56 pm
(@alana33)
Posts: 12366
Illustrious Member
 

Here's the Daily News article which has a bit more depth to it.
http://m.virginislandsdailynews.com/news/mandahl-project-dead-lawsuit-lives-on-1.1848142

Glad they are going ahead with the lawsuit. Hopefully, it will get settled, once and for all, that Mandahl Bay is not a site to be developed but to remain for public use and not for a massive and inappropriate, invasive development.

 
Posted : March 15, 2015 11:33 am
Search this website Type then hit enter to search
Close Menu