Developers get heat...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Developers get heated reception in Caribbean

(@the-islander)
Posts: 3030
Member
Topic starter
 

Saw this article and thought some might find it interesting...

Sarasota developers get heated reception in Caribbean
Bay Isles Associates is building on St. John, U.S. Virgin Islands, but neighbors are fighting back.
By DEVONA WALKER
(article at http://www.heraldtribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070312/BUSINESS/703120546/-1/xml)

The Caribbean is being sold to American condo buyers as a place to kick back and enjoy a slow-paced luxury lifestyle.

But prominent Southwest Florida developer David Band and his partner, Kelly Frye, have stirred up a fiery controversy in a U.S. Virgin Islands hamlet with their Grande Bay Resort.

The two, forming a partnership called Bay Isles Associates, are being sued by neighboring property owners in Cruz Bay who claim that Grande Bay is a grand nuisance infringing on their property rights.

The outcry over the project in St. John -- population 5,000 -- has sparked the formation of what some are calling the community's first-ever anti-development community organizing group, the St. John's Coalition.

"They are big players, but guess what? Big players don't always play by the rules," said Elizabeth Trey, who with her mother, Anastasia, and Natalie and Alexander Jadan filed suit claiming that Grande Bay violates St. John's height and density restrictions.

"We have to find a way to have smart growth development on this island and avoid these mainland developers who come along with their mega-sized developments."

Neither the Treys nor the Jadans are members of the St. John's Coalition, but their struggle is likely to be one echoed at other places in the azure-watered islands of the Caribbean as developers from Florida and around the world pour billions into the area as the next big thing. With mainland waterfront property rapidly disappearing, the Caribbean is enticing would-be resort builders like never before.

The complaint against Grande Bay revolves around its sheer magnitude. The suit against Band and Frye claims the island's codes place a three-story limit on buildings. Grande Bay has five stories.

Band, perhaps best known in Southwest Florida for the development of the Hollywood 20 movie theater in Sarasota and his part-ownership of the Hyatt Sarasota, says that he and his partner built exactly what they were permitted to.

"I don't understand how this woman can come along and raise these issues just because she doesn't like it, after it's already been built," Band said.

"And she's made quite a stink about it."

Coalition members worry about the sheer number of condominium owners who might be trekking around the property. The Grande Bay project will include "lock-out" units that allow owners the option of renting out part of their residence. That occupancy potential was never considered in the review of the project, the lawsuit says.

But the crux of Trey's issue with Grande Bay is rooted in the very thing the developers are now selling to tranquility-starved Americans and Europeans: the view. Trey owns a small cottage built on a steep hill that once offered a sweeping panorama of St. John.

"We use to have an unobstructed view of Cruz Bay, the outer islands and Cays, and to the west, St. Thomas," Trey said of the 850-square-foot cottage that has been in her family for a half-century.

"Now I see a 35-foot, 3,500-square-foot concrete wall with a bunch of windows -- just 25 feet from my balcony. I've got to walk to the edge of the balcony to see the sky."

'The quality of our lives'

The St. John's Coalition was formed after a hearing of the U.S. Virgin Islands' legislative body -- the Senate -- at which Band and Frye asked to have their land rezoned to expand the footprint of Grande Bay.

The developers were granted the zoning variance, but that approval was later vetoed by Charles Turnbull, who was governor of the Virgin Islands at the time. But neither the coalition nor Trey's lawsuit has prevented Grande Bay's construction, though the increased public scrutiny of new development projects has killed subsequent proposals.

"We primarily address building, environment and land-use issues that immediately affect the quality of our lives," said Alan Smith, a St. John's Coalition member.

The coalition notes that the Virgin Islands has had problems with corruption within its Department of Planning and Natural Resources. Local newspapers, including the Virgin Islands Daily News, have followed those stories closely.

Former DPNR official Hollis Griffin was convicted in September of contract fraud, while another department official, Dean Plaskett, was implicated in the same infamous corruption case, The Elite scandal. Another official, Montclair Guishand, was convicted in 2003 of accepting a $20,000 bribe in a separate case.

A federal audit of the DPNR revealed it failed to collect hundreds of thousands of dollars in permit fees, allowed contractors to build without permits and failed to review architectural plans.

Trey's lawsuit claims that she was promised repeatedly by developers that their project would not block her view.

Band denies any such conversations: "I haven't talked to the woman except once when she came up to me on the street, and that's the only dealings I've had with her."

Trey also claims that she requested copies of Grande Bay's plans from permitting officials 13 times during a six-month period, and that permitting official Douglas Hodge repeatedly promised to send them.

A day after the Senate hearing -- nearly a year later -- Trey says Hodge gave her copies of the plans that showed the resort obstructing her view. She said he told her that the permits already had been issued.

Hodge declined to answer any questions about the case, but a spokesman for the DPNR, Jamal Nielsen, said the department makes its plans readily available to the public. Nielsen said he could not speak specifically to Trey's allegations.

The suit against Grande Bay is still in the discovery phase, and Trey's attorney said he is having difficulty getting information out of Band and Frye.

"We just want the basics of what has been done so far," said Lorren Caffee, the quartet's St. John-based attorney. "This has been the most egregious case of stonewalling I've seen in 30 years. It's tactical. They are just trying to drive up our expenses and our cost so they can go ahead and do what they have been doing."

Caffee acknowledges that Band and Frye will likely complete Grande Bay, but he hopes his clients will receive compensation for the loss of their views and rental incomes for their property. He said the lawsuit has galvanized the community and alerted permitting officials to the public's concerns.

"I do believe DPNR has started to wake up," Caffee said. "What had been politically acceptable has become less so recently. This public awareness has somewhat cooled things."

Band disagreed, saying that the U.S. Virgin Islands government did its job and that he has been surprised by the reaction from Trey and the coalition.

"It's hard for me to believe that this government that's been so nice in their dealings with people for so many years -- that she doesn't like the government," he said.

 
Posted : March 14, 2007 9:10 pm
dntw8up
(@dntw8up)
Posts: 1866
Noble Member
 

It's unfortunate that these developers from Florida have found the USVI government to have been "so nice... for so many years."

 
Posted : March 14, 2007 9:21 pm
(@ronnie)
Posts: 2259
Noble Member
 

I had some guests the other day that were ashamed to say they had bought one of the condos there. They will be selling as soon as they can. They said it is way more than was represented in the original offerings!

RL

 
Posted : March 15, 2007 1:31 am
 Bart
(@Bart)
Posts: 0
New Member
 

Can I be blunt.
David Band and Kelly Frye are SCUM in my opinion.
Any HUMAN with any type of HEART would have at least built Grande Bay not to block the property holders view from above. There was money to be made in going smaller. I'm not a litigious individual but I hope the Trey's can make them pay in the end. That is all those people understand. It is up to the USVI government to "get itself together". The laziness and not caring needs to end. Hopefully the new administration has a pulse.

 
Posted : March 15, 2007 3:50 pm
(@Andrea266)
Posts: 114
Estimable Member
 

I just wanted to point out in general...not necessarily referring to Grande Bay...that if someone purchases a piece of land, they have every right to develop that piece of land ACCORDING TO VI CODE. With the recent anti-development movement here on St. John, many people seem to forget that. If people feel that what is being built here does not fit with the island, they should go to the government and ask for the codes to be changed instead of chastizing people who do, in fact, follow the code.
Although it's quite rude, there is no law in the VI against blocking someone's view, and when purchasing a piece of land, one needs to be aware of the zoning of the properties surrounding them and take into account what could legally be built by their neighbors.
On another note, from what I've heard, the descriptions offered by posters of David Band and Kelly Frye are quite accurate.

 
Posted : March 15, 2007 5:12 pm
(@Betty)
Posts: 2045
Noble Member
 

Andrea in the article it says, "The suit against Band and Frye claims the island's codes place a three-story limit on buildings. Grande Bay has five stories."

It seems like they did violate code not just someone's view.

 
Posted : March 15, 2007 6:06 pm
(@Andrea266)
Posts: 114
Estimable Member
 

Without getting into a long-winded explanation, Grande Bay has five "levels," not all of which are considered "stories." One level is the garage, which, by VI Code, is not considered a story. Three levels are habitable space, which are considered stories. The fifth level is an enclosed mezzanine, which many people believe should count as another story unless the mezzanine is open to the floor below it (in this case it's enclosed).
Here is what the VI Code says about a mezzanine: "A mezzanine shall be deemed a full story when it covers more than thirty-three (33) percent of the area of the story underneath said mezzanine, or if the vertical distance from the floor next below it to the floor next above it is twenty-four (24) feet or more. "
Seems to me like it doesn't say either way whether a mezzanine should be open or closed to the floor below, but I am not an expert.
I emailed the reporter who wrote that story to let her know the discrepancy, and she acknowledged her wording was wrong.
Anyway...I in no way defend Grande Bay, I'm just trying to make sure the correct facts are presented.

 
Posted : March 15, 2007 7:24 pm
(@Betty)
Posts: 2045
Noble Member
 

So you're saying they followed the letter of the law but not the intent? I think to anyone asked a level would be considered a story. Seems like a bunch of legalize garbage created by lawyers to weasel something through.

 
Posted : March 15, 2007 7:32 pm
(@Andrea266)
Posts: 114
Estimable Member
 

I don't know whether Grande Bay followed the letter of the law or not. I've had this debate enough and I'm not trying to start it again.
If anyone thinks garages and mezzanines should be considered stories or that levels should be considered stories, ask the Legislature to change the code.
For now, when you look at the VI Code, which is what governs construction in the Virgin Islands whether we like it or not, things like garages and mezzanines are not stories. They could be considered levels by many people, but for legal purposes, a level is not a story.
I'm not saying this is right or wrong, but it's what is in the Code.

 
Posted : March 15, 2007 7:52 pm
 jane
(@jane)
Posts: 532
Honorable Member
 

I hate to say it, but Andrea is smack on the money!!! The amount of funds tied up in that project, and the experience of those developers tells me that they will have gone over VI Code with a fine toothcomb and may well be 'dancing up to the edge' - but they are far too experienced to have gone over it!

 
Posted : March 15, 2007 8:03 pm
Teresa
(@Teresa)
Posts: 684
Honorable Member
 

Legal or not, I think it is rude to build something that blocks others views. Just because you have the means doesn't make you more entitled to do what you want at the expense of others. I am all for new development, but in Florida and other coast lines there are towers a plenty. I thought in this century, we were moving away from that and developing things that are more environmentally friendly and blend with the terrain. Oh well, so much for wishful thinking. Sigh.

Teresa

 
Posted : March 16, 2007 11:07 am
Search this website Type then hit enter to search
Close Menu