Monsanto Protection Act  

 

noOne
(@noOne)
Trusted Member
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 1495
March 27, 2013 10:10 pm  

'Monsanto Protection Act' slips silently through US Congress

Our government hard at work protecting the rights of a corporation:

The US House of Representatives quietly passed a last-minute addition to the Agricultural Appropriations Bill for 2013 last week - including a provision protecting genetically modified seeds from litigation in the face of health risks.


Quote
LiquidFluoride
(@LiquidFluoride)
Trusted Member
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 1937
March 27, 2013 10:42 pm  

Scariest thing you will ever hear:

DON'T WORRY! I'm from the government & I'm here to help!

Proven to be true yet again.......

There was a [URL="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/abinazir/2011/06/15/what-are-chances-you-would-be-born/"]1: 400,000,000,000,000[/URL] chance of you being born: what have you done with your miraculous life today?


ReplyQuote
VT2VI
(@VT2VI)
Advanced Member
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 273
March 27, 2013 11:36 pm  

Can't pass a fricken budget though. >=[

F-F-F-Freezing in the great white north


ReplyQuote
Jamison
(@Jamison)
Trusted Member
Joined: 8 years ago
Posts: 1037
March 28, 2013 4:59 am  

Disgusting. Support your local farmers and here on STX, we have some great ones everywhere. It's one of the best things we can do for our island and our health.


ReplyQuote
Alana33
(@Alana33)
Expert
Joined: 8 years ago
Posts: 12220
March 28, 2013 10:58 am  

Very scary that they would do this but not unexpected since there is no honor amongst theives.


ReplyQuote
LiquidFluoride
(@LiquidFluoride)
Trusted Member
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 1937
March 28, 2013 4:39 pm  

interesting petition going around

A copy of your letter of support will be delivered to President Obama, your Member of Congress and Senators:

Dear President Obama,

I'm outraged that Congress allowed Section 735, the Monsanto Protection Act in a short-term spending bill and passed it and that you have now signed it into law. This is a deep betrayal of our most basic constitutional rights and by signing H.R. 933 without issuing a signing statement or taking other actions to block this provision you have allowed great harm to America's family farmers, our environment and our democracy.

In an effort to balance this violation of our basic rights, I am urging you as President to issue an Executive Order to require the mandatory labeling of genetically engineered foods, something that you promised farmers while on the campaign trail in 2007.

It is urgent that the U.S. government rectify the 20 year old politically engineered loophole and allow for open and transparent labeling of genetically engineered foods, a basic right that citizens in 62 others countries already enjoy.

Sincerely,

[Your Name]

http://action.fooddemocracynow.org/sign/obama_signs_monsanto_protection_act_time_to_label_gmos/

There was a [URL="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/abinazir/2011/06/15/what-are-chances-you-would-be-born/"]1: 400,000,000,000,000[/URL] chance of you being born: what have you done with your miraculous life today?


ReplyQuote
Alana33
(@Alana33)
Expert
Joined: 8 years ago
Posts: 12220

ReplyQuote
VT2VI
(@VT2VI)
Advanced Member
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 273
March 29, 2013 11:11 am  

Alana, done!

Liquid, Are we allowed to petition the CiC? If so I will go and sign that one as well.

F-F-F-Freezing in the great white north


ReplyQuote
speee1dy
(@speee1dy)
Expert
Joined: 12 years ago
Posts: 8750
March 29, 2013 12:09 pm  

monsanto is scarry


ReplyQuote
Alana33
(@Alana33)
Expert
Joined: 8 years ago
Posts: 12220
March 31, 2013 5:11 pm  

Products You Thought Were GMO-Safe

http://www.care2.com/greenliving/products-you-thought-were-gmo-safe.html

Petition to Label GMOs Filed With the FDA

http://www.care2.com/greenliving/petition-to-label-gmos-filed-with-the-fda.html


ReplyQuote
Isle Tell Ya
(@Isle_Tell_Ya)
Advanced Member
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 106
March 31, 2013 10:26 pm  

It's very noble that so many people are outraged by the passage of the law, and of Monsanto's actions. That being said, they have been beating the system for a very, very long time - hello Agent Orange. This is a losing fight.


ReplyQuote
Alana33
(@Alana33)
Expert
Joined: 8 years ago
Posts: 12220
April 3, 2013 12:57 am  

The Monsanto Protection Act? A Debate on Controversial New Measure Over Genetically Modified Crops.

http://www.democracynow.org/2013/4/2/the_monsanto_protection_act_a_debate


ReplyQuote
noOne
(@noOne)
Trusted Member
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 1495
April 4, 2013 5:07 am  

Interestingly, according to John Stewart, this act was slipped in anonymously. Hmm.

Edit: actually I have to say more.

This piece of legislation was not competed by any Senator, and they knew about it.

Disgusting.


ReplyQuote
VT2VI
(@VT2VI)
Advanced Member
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 273
April 4, 2013 10:29 am  

That"s our elected officials for ya. Always looking out for us, er I mean big money.

F-F-F-Freezing in the great white north


ReplyQuote
Alana33
(@Alana33)
Expert
Joined: 8 years ago
Posts: 12220
April 7, 2013 11:50 am  

If genetically modified seeds and foods cause health problems, should biotech companies be held legally responsible? Don’t think too hard because Congress and President Barack Obama have already decided for you – and the answer is a frightening no.

Almost any industry that puts its consumers in harm’s way is subject to lawsuits, but the U.S. government has granted corporations that genetically alter food an exemption by sneaking it into the Agricultural Appropriations Bill. The bill, which was quickly signed into law, included this particular provision, HR 933, which activists are not so lovingly referring to as the Monsanto Protection Act.

Monsanto, of course, is the agricultural biotechnology giant constantly surrounded by controversy. Considering the company had the most to gain from this law’s passage, surely it played some role in lobbying. It begs the question: if Monsanto genuinely believes its approach to agriculture is not harmful, why would it go to such great, secretive lengths to grant itself immunity from litigation?

Perhaps it’d be less alarming if Monsanto had built a respectable reputation, but one word can continually be applied to the corporation’s business practices:

Untrustworthy
Untrustworthy
Untrustworthy
Untrustworthy
Untrustworthy
Untrustworthy
Untrustworthy
Similarly untrustworthy? Senator Barbara Mikulski, a Democrat from Maryland and the chairperson for the Senate Apporpriations Committee who quietly added the amendment to the Agricultural Appropriations Bill. Usually such provisions are given a hearing and review, but this one was tacked on anonymously as the bill was rushed to a vote. The Center for Food Safety has been particularly critical of Mikulski, saying, “In this hidden backroom deal, Sen. Mikulski turned her back on consumer, environmental and farmer protection in favor of corporate welfare for biotech companies such as Monsanto.”

Obama has also received criticism for signing the bill into law. To be fair, the President was in a sticky situation since not signing it would have left the United States without a federal budget and effectively shut down the government. That said, it wouldn’t be the first time Obama has approved a dubious provision because it is part of a larger bill that is supposedly essential (see the NDAA and indefinite detention).

Senator Mikulski is using a similar excuse. A press release from her office declared that she neither wrote nor supported the Monsanto Protection Act, adding, “[Her] first responsibility was to prevent a government shutdown. That meant she had to compromise on many of her own priorities to get a bill through the Senate that the House would pass.”

Meanwhile, other members of Congress are trying to avoid the blame altogether. According to Salon, the provision was so secretive that many Senators and Representatives claim they were unaware they were voting on that part of the bill. However, it seems pretty inexcusable for Congresspeople (and their staffs) to not read bills in full before voting on them, no matter the stakes. At some point, it doesn’t matter whether the politicians are corrupt or just incompetent: both yield terrible results.

If there is any good news about this whole debacle, it is that since the entire bill was passed on an emergency basis, the law is only effect for six months. The real question will be now that the formerly “oblivious” members of Congress have been made aware by concerned Americans, will they put a stop to this dangerous precedent or renew it to continue to protect their negligent corporate friends?

Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/monsanto-now-unstoppable-thanks-to-congress.html#ixzz2PmGXgIQ8


ReplyQuote
aussie
(@aussie)
Trusted Member
Joined: 13 years ago
Posts: 876
April 10, 2013 9:17 pm  

Just label them!


ReplyQuote
LiquidFluoride
(@LiquidFluoride)
Trusted Member
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 1937
April 11, 2013 6:28 pm  

Just label them!

Does it seem like politicians promise exactly what they will NOT do in speaches like this?

Remember Bush & "no new taxes" ?

Obama & "transparency"

etc...

There was a [URL="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/abinazir/2011/06/15/what-are-chances-you-would-be-born/"]1: 400,000,000,000,000[/URL] chance of you being born: what have you done with your miraculous life today?


ReplyQuote
Settlers Handbook

Thinking about moving to the Virgin Islands?

The Settler's Handbook is a Indispensable Guide

The current 18th Edition, will help you explore your dream of island living. A solid reference book, it was first published in 1975. That's 40 years of helping people move to the Virgin Islands.

Order Today $17.95
Close Menu

Please Login or Register